Coco Gauff vs Amanda Anisimova Odds, Prediction and Betting Trends for 2022 Wimbledon Women's Round 3 Match

Larry Rupp
Coco Gauff vs Amanda Anisimova odds and prediction for Wimbledon women's singles match.
Coco Gauff vs Amanda Anisimova odds and prediction for Wimbledon women's singles match. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports
facebooktwitterreddit

Gauff vs Anisimova Wimbledon Schedule & Info

2022 Wimbledon Women's Third Round Match
No. 10 Coco Gauff vs. No. 20 Amanda Anisimova
Date: Saturday, July 2, 2022
Start Time: 8:30 a.m. ET
Venue: All England Club — London, England

Gauff vs Anisimova Odds & Set Betting

All 2022 Wimbledon betting odds and prop bets are available on FanDuel Sportsbook.
Moneyline: Guaff: (-230) | Anisimova: (+188)
To Win 1st Set: Gauff: (-186) | Anisimova: (+150)
Set Betting: Gauff: 2-0 (+115) | 2-1 (+260)
Set Betting: Anisimova: 2-0 (+410) | 2-1 (+420)

Gauff vs Anisimova Prediction & Pick

All Wimbledon expert predictions & picks are made by Tennis Tonic.
- Prediction: Gauff in 2 sets

Gauff vs Anisimova Head-to-Head Stats & Betting Trends

- Coco Gauff defeated Amanda Anisimova in two sets during their only all-time matchup on May 20, 2021.
- Gauff's best finish at Wimbledon was a fourth-round elimination in 2019 & 2021.
- Anisimova's best finish at Wimbledon was a second-round elimination in 2019.
- Gauff defeated Mihaela Buzarnescu in two sets during Round 2 of 2022 Wimbledon.
- Anisimova defeated Lauren Davis in three sets during Round 2 of 2022 Wimbledon.

dark. SIGN UP NOW. Up to $1,000 in Free Bets if you don't win your first bet!

Larry Rupp is not a FanDuel employee. In addition to providing DFS gameplay advice, Larry Rupp also participates in DFS contests on FanDuel using his personal account, username phillyfan424. While the strategies and player selections recommended in his articles are his personal views, he may deploy different strategies and player selections when entering contests with his personal account. The views expressed in their articles are the author's alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of FanDuel. 

facebooktwitterreddit