Cover Photo: Jim Rogash/Getty Images

D.K. Metcalf was the talk of the 2019 NFL Scouting Combine, putting up some unreal numbers almost across the board in the various physical tests that all top draft prospects go through. 

Metcalf had already made waves prior to the NFL Combine when a photo of him after a workout surfaced online weeks ago, but finally seeing that physicality go to work made Metcalf even more impressive. 

A 6'3", 230-pound receiver who runs a 4.3 40-yard dash and can bench 27 reps? That's some video game level stuff right there. 

However, for how physically strong and fast Metcalf is, he does still have a weakness – changing direction. 

While nearly every test saw Metcalf pass with flying colors, his 3-cone drill and 20-yard shuttle were among the worst for all wideouts. To put it in perspective how bad his lateral movement is, there's this.

Tom Brady was faster from a lateral movement standpoint than Metcalf is right now and change of direction is a bit more important for wide receivers than it is for quarterbacks. Also, keep in mind that Brady wasn't exactly a "physical specimen."

So while he's still utterly impressive, this is could be a major red flag for Metcalf in the eyes of some NFL teams and it might cause him to drop a few spots, despite all his other incredible physical attributes. 

Obviously, someone is still going to draft Metcalf given his physical talent, but keep an eye out for the first time he has to make a quick cut or change of direction when the season starts this September.

Join FanDuel Sportsbook Today. New users get a risk-free bet up to $500. Join Now.

Ian McCafferty is not a FanDuel employee. In addition to providing DFS gameplay advice, Ian McCafferty also participates in DFS contests on FanDuel using his personal account, username itmccaff. While the strategies and player selections recommended in his articles are his personal views, he may deploy different strategies and player selections when entering contests with his personal account. The views expressed in their articles are the author's alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of FanDuel.​​