Dan Hooker vs Michael Chandler Odds, Prediction, Fight Info, Stream & Betting Insights For UFC 257

Hooker vs Chandler Fight Info, Date & Time

UFC 257 — Lightweight Co-Main Event
Dan "The Hangman" Hooker (20-9-0, 10 KO, 7 Submissions) vs. Michael "Iron" Chandler (21-5-0, 9 KO, 7 Submissions)
Date: Saturday, Jan. 23, 2021
Fight Time: This will be the fourth fight of the main card, which begins at 10 p.m. EST.
Venue: Etihad Arena — Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Stream: PPV

Hooker vs Chandler Odds & Betting Info

All UFC 257 odds, lines and prop bets are available on FanDuel Sportsbook.
Moneyline:
- Dan Hooker: (-132)
- Michael Chandler: (+108)
- Draw: (+5000)

Method of Victory:
- Hooker by KO/TKO: (+230)
- Hooker by Points: (+320)
- Hooker by Submission: (+1200)
- Chandler by KO/TKO: (+460)
- Chandler by Points: (+260)
- Chandler by Submission: (+1200)

Hooker vs Chandler Prediction

UFC 257 Hooker-Chandler prediction is from Tapology Fight Predictions.
Winner: Dan Hooker (66%)
Method of Victory: KO/TKO (62%)

Hooker vs Chandler Betting Trends & Stats

- Dan Hooker lost to Dustin Poirier, by unanimous decision, in his most recent fight on Jun. 27, 2020.
- Michael Chandler defeated Benson Henderson, by KO, in his most recent fight on Aug. 7, 2020.
- Hooker averages 4.98 significant strikes landed per minute with a 48% accuracy rate.
- Hooker averages 4.89 significant strikes absorbed per minute with a 52% defense rate.
- Hooker has an 79% takedown defense rate.
- Michael Chandler is making his UFC debut, so has no UFC stats.

Sign up for FanDuel Sportsbook today and get your first bet risk free for up to $1,000!

Michael Obermuller is not a FanDuel employee. In addition to providing DFS gameplay advice, Michael Obermuller also participates in DFS contests on FanDuel using his personal account, username king_mizzard. While the strategies and player selections recommended in his articles are his personal views, he may deploy different strategies and player selections when entering contests with his personal account. The views expressed in their articles are the author's alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of FanDuel.