Since we have the asset side of the ledger on the leaderboards, why not include the debt side as well? Having a complete picture would be much better than only getting half the story...

I agree

I think management doesnt want to remind people how much they are losing though

Probably not, but it is definetely something I would like to see as well.

I'd love to see that.

Actually the concern isn't so much around reminding users that they are losing but that they don't really want the world to know. Having a net win leaderboard is something we are thinking about but we would also have to give people the option to opt out.

Something else to think about...if things are eventually changed so you can avoid playing specific players, then the best players will also want to opt out of a 'net win' leaderboard, since nobody is going to want to play them. Right now, we don't really know who the best players are, since we can't see losses.

michael redd sucks

thx 4 the update

Nigel I got a question Why would someone play a $25 dollar game instead of 5 $5 dollar game. I have only played one $25 game and won, but I noticed a lot of people play 5 $5 games and I think the reason is for two reasons: they assume a lesser player would gamble 5 and the fee is 10% either way.

so what is the incentive for someone to play $25 dollar game other than all or nothing. only reason i bring it up, is i think it would be good to discourage people to play tons of $5 games. maybe the point will be moot when the community doubles in size. just thinking outloud